VISIT WEBSITE >>>>> http://gg.gg/y83ws?4656743 <<<<<<
Since the change of the law in New Zealand, there has been a fall in the number of people who believe physical punishment is effective and acceptable.
Last year 63 per cent of parents surveyed said that, since the law changed, they never, or only rarely, smack their children. In Australia, the naysayers are already making the case that because such a law would be impossible to monitor, the country is better off not making the change.
This misses the point that the law can embody a community's standards and standing. The legislation should happen. For the sake of our children. A new season, a new pair of boots … that is the experience of many fortunate Australians. Old or outgrown boots are lost in a cupboard or discarded.
Come the end of this season, though, we hope Victorians remember less fortunate Australian children who love football but play it barefoot on the hard red earth of remote indigenous communities.
In conjunction with Coles, which has placed collection bins in its supermarkets until the end of September, and Linfox, which will distribute boots to these communities, The Age has launched Boots for Kids. The project's first goal is simple: to kit out children who love playing football. The idea originated with ex-Collingwood and All Australian player Leon Davis, who wanted to help improve the lives of children in the kind of community he grew up in.
He has inspired them to dream of playing in the AFL, but says that materially they are no better off and life in some communities is worse. I was shocked when one presentation went through some of the evidence on how smacking is related to physical abuse, and how many countries in the world allowed it. The UK was in fact behind, then, back in ; and although Scotland has now banned smacking and Wales is debating a ban, England and N.
Even if no physical mark is left, the emotional and psychological consequences are detrimental. There is evidence on the negative effects of physical punishment on children from a range of studies Gershoff, Physical punishment has been associated with child mental health problems, later aggressive behaviour, and increased risk of more severe forms of abuse, even when sociodemographic factors are held constant.
The use of smacking is often framed as a family-specific issue, in which the government should not interfere. Yet, the laws of a country are powerful disincentives for behaviours. Rowland et al reframe it nicely, when they write of a child being the only person in the UK that it is legal to hit.
Put like this, why would we allow it to be legal to hit some of the most vulnerable? Another viewpoint is that a ban will result in wasting resources on families where care is mostly good, rather than identifying families where physical abuse is chronic. Some say that a smack is a helpful rare reaction to a situation where a child may be about to do something dangerous, to prevent them from serious harm.
Yet when we look to Sweden, where smacking was banned since Durrant, , there is no evidence to suggest that children come to more harm because smacking has been made illegal. Swedish parents faced with a child about to do something dangerous can still shout or pull them away from the danger. Both physical and cruel verbal punishments are unhelpful Berlin et al, Children do need to learn about what is acceptable behaviour or not, but smacking risks teaching them that violence is OK Waterston, There are many parenting programmes which advocate using reward more than punishment: using copious amounts of play, praise, and attention e.
Webster-Stratton, These same parenting programmes suggest that punishment should be a reasonable and brief non-violent consequence for a behaviour along with a brief and clear explanation of why it was not permissible. Whilst sadly the idea of the naughty step has captured the public imagination more than the idea of increased time playing together, the programmes prioritise positive reinforcement over punishment any time.
In my view it is just another form of bullying and the child would not benefit from this as they will just end up being bullies themselves. This would be the parent or guardian's own fault for putting the child in a violent environment.
I also think that it is a crime as it could lead to danger, for example physical and emotional scars. Some parents do not realise the psychological affect smacking could have on their children, after all it is physical abuse and a child at that age cannot do anything about it.
However, parents have a lot to put up with these days and caring for young children is not an easy job for any young parent. It is a good idea if a single parent has someone with them, e. Some parents could prevent these problems though by minimising the dangers in the household and by making use of relatives and friends to babysit on occasions.
This is my personal opinion on smacking and, although I think it is wrong, I understand that there are two sides to the problem and I'm sure the debate on this topic will continue. Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website. If you need this or any other sample, we can send it to you via email.
Please, specify your valid email address. Remember that this is just a sample essay and since it might not be original, we do not recommend to submit it. However, we might edit this sample to provide you with a plagiarism-free paper. Search for: Search. Related posts: Smith v.
Hi there, would you like to get such a paper?
コメント